Jury Members Discuss Thought Process Behind Apple vs. Samsung Verdict

MacRumors writes, Reuters and CNet have interviewed members of the Apple / Samsung patent trial jury who awarded Apple over $1 billion in damages over patent infringement claims against Samsung. Reuters spoke with jury foreman Velvin Hogan who explained that they found Apple's arguments persuasive about the need to protect innovation. Furthermore, Hogan says it was "absolutely" clear based on Samsung executive testimony that the infringement was purposeful. In the CNet interview with another Apple v. Samsung juror, Manuel Ilagan reiterated that it was "clear there was infringement". When asked for...

Continue reading Jury Members Discuss Thought Process Behind Apple vs. Samsung Verdict at MacRumors